Blog Post #5

Overall, I have found AI to be a useful tool for searching information, but I approach it differently than I do with Google. When using Google, I typically search for straightforward answers or a selection of possibilities. With AI, I provide more context or a detailed prompt, and in return, it generates tailored responses or multiple solutions. As someone who generally dislikes technology, I hesitate to call AI beneficial, but I can acknowledge its usefulness when applied properly.  

For example, I recently asked ChatGPT for recommendations on places to move after graduation by giving it a list of specific requirements. It quickly narrowed down my options, saving me time that I would have otherwise spent sorting through countless search results. While this convenience is appealing, I do worry about the long-term effects of relying on AI. I could have done my own research and evaluated locations individually, but instead, I opted for an easier, more automated approach. Over time, I think this type of dependence on AI will lead to a decline in effort and creativity, making us more passive in how we engage with information.  


Despite its advantages, I would never fully replace traditional search engines with AI. I prefer having multiple sources to verify information rather than relying on a generalization of them. Knowing where your information comes from and cross-referencing different perspectives is essential, and AI falls short in this regard. However, for situations that don’t require specificity, multiple options, or direct sources, AI can be a helpful tool for gaining a general understanding and solving complex problems more efficiently.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post #2

     Throughout my schooling, I frequently used MS Word for various writing assignments, typically in Times New Roman 12-point font with the occasional double spacing—especially when teachers required printed copies to leave room for handwritten feedback. As the years progressed, we transitioned to digital submissions, which initially led me to prefer Google Docs since my personal computer didn’t have Microsoft Word and my school didn’t provide it at the time. I found Google Docs more accessible, especially since it was browser-based and easy to navigate. However, after gaining access to Microsoft Word through FSU, I’ve come to appreciate its robust customization features. I’ve also encountered compatibility issues when converting Google Docs to Word, so I now prefer to stick with a single, universally accepted platform for consistency and ease.      I find all the ISTE standards for educators valuable, but the one that resonates most with me is “Collaborat...
Read more

Blog Post #4

One of the second-grade ELA technology standards involves using an online dictionary and thesaurus to support vocabulary development. This standard helps students expand their word choices and understand nuances in meaning, ultimately improving their writing and reading comprehension. I feel prepared to implement this in class, as I am comfortable with digital tools and can guide students through interactive vocabulary activities. However, I was surprised by some of the other standards, such as an online scavenger hunt, which seems quite advanced for this age group. While I can confidently incorporate basic technology into lessons, I need to develop my skills further to effectively teach more complex digital literacy concepts. The CPALMS Educator Toolkit offers various resources to enhance lesson planning, including a virtual tour of the Statue of Liberty for second-grade math. This interactive tool allows students to engage in budgeting activities while also learning about an importan...
Read more